Selection and Solutions · Downloadable

Assessing Suitability for Vacuum Handling

Assess vacuum handling from surface sealing, porosity, effective suction area and workpiece stiffness, and identify when to use particular cup layouts, auxiliary supports or alternative gripping methods.

AUREK-RC-AR-001VersionV1.0Updated2026-09-07Read about 6 minutes

Selection and Solutions
Illustrative image of the topic; it does not show specific equipment or a customer site
← Back to resource catalog
Key points of this article
  • Vacuum gripping requires a stable, repeatable seal at the contact surface.
  • Assess four factors: surface condition, permeability, weight relative to contact area, and stiffness and deformation.
  • Cartons, sheet metal, glass, acrylic and flat plastic parts are common candidates. Porous, highly permeable, severely deformed or oily workpieces require closer assessment.
  • For uncertain applications, use vacuum tests on actual samples to establish the cup type and array.

Vacuum gripping suits workpieces that can form a stable seal and provide sufficient effective suction area. Cartons, panels, sheet metal and glass differ considerably in surface condition and stiffness. Assess actual samples during selection; material names alone cannot establish suitability.

01Vacuum holding principles

A suction cup uses the pressure difference between its interior and exterior over the effective suction area to generate holding force. Available suction force depends on pressure differential, sealing and effective area. Selection must also account for workpiece weight, handling orientation and load distribution. Raising vacuum alone cannot compensate for insufficient suction area.

02Four suitability factors

Surface condition

A cup must form a continuous seal with the workpiece. Flat, continuous surfaces make contact easier; holes, grooves, ribs, burrs, oil and dust may impair sealing or contact stability. Identify the actual usable suction areas before choosing cup designs and positions.

Permeability

Cartons, wood panels, foam, textiles and some powder-compacted parts may leak continuously. Assess vacuum-source suction flow, cup arrays and system suitability against actual porosity. When using pneumatic vacuum generators, also verify the compressed-air supply. If stable holding cannot be achieved, consider another gripping method.

Weight and effective suction area

Assess workpiece weight together with available suction area. For a heavy workpiece with a small contact surface, distribute suction points and increase effective area. If surface or space constraints still leave insufficient area, use a suitable mechanical gripping method.

Stiffness and deformation

Thin sheets, flexible packaging and low-stiffness workpieces may warp, sag or deform under localized suction. Distribute cups and add auxiliary supports according to the observed deformation to avoid excessive load concentration.

AUREK vacuum lifter handling a carton with multiple suction cups on its upper surface.
Carton handling requires checks of surface strength, sealing and contact area to prevent local deformation.

03Material suitability comparison

The table below provides an initial comparison of suction conditions for different materials. Coatings, surface quality and structure can vary even within one material, so assess the specific layout using samples and actual handling movements.

03 Material suitability comparison — data table
Workpiece / materialApplicabilityDescription
Sheet metal/coverSuitableThe surface is flat, airtight and has stable vacuum gripping, making it a typical object for vacuum handling.
Glass / acrylic / panelsSuitableThe surface is smooth and well sealed. Pay attention to anti-slip and edge protection.
Flat plastic parts / injection molded partsGenerally suitableRequires a continuous flat contact surface; curved or perforated parts need a dedicated cup assessment.
Cartons / boxed productsGenerally suitableVacuum handling is commonly used, but attention should be paid to surface strength, sealing and vacuum gripping area.
Wood / porous panelsRequires assessmentHigh permeability may require greater evacuation flow or a denser array. Use mechanical gripping where needed.
Rough / oily / highly permeable workpiecesOften unsuitableStable vacuum is difficult to establish. Consider mechanical jaws, internal-expansion tooling or dedicated grippers.

04When to change the gripping method

  • Surface cannot be sealed: Porous, highly breathable, deeply textured or heavily oiled workpieces.
  • Insufficient contact area: a heavy workpiece with only a small flat area may not provide enough holding force.
  • Deformable workpieces: large, thin, flexible parts may sag or detach under vacuum-only support.
  • Pressure-sensitive surfaces: assess cup material and contact pressure for precision or cosmetic parts prone to indentations and marks.
Sample testing: where suitability is uncertain, test an actual workpiece for stable vacuum build-up, sufficient holding time and deformation. Use the results to select cup type and array layout.

05Improving holding stability

  • Multi-point suction cup array: Distributes force and covers a larger area, suitable for heavy and large-format workpieces.
  • Cup selection: match flat, bellows or foam designs to the surface, sealing and compliance requirements.
  • Match evacuation flow to the required vacuum level: Increase evacuation capacity for slightly porous workpieces to maintain vacuum.
  • Cushioning and anti-slip design: Add buffering and positioning structures to reduce slippage and collision during transportation.
  • Provide auxiliary supports or lifting supports to share localized loads on low-stiffness workpieces and maintain the handling orientation.

During selection, check sealing surfaces, porosity, effective suction area and deformation in sequence, then match cups, the vacuum system and auxiliary supports. Sample testing should cover actual pick-and-place orientations and the handling process as the basis for configuration assessment.

Need an application assessment? Share workpiece information and site conditions so our engineering team can assess the handling method and tooling.
View Vacuum Handling Products

Common questions

Which workpieces are suitable for vacuum gripping and handling?

Vacuum handling may suit workpieces with surfaces that form stable seals, sufficient effective suction area and appropriate stiffness, such as sheet metal, glass, acrylic and flat plastic parts. Cartons and boxes additionally require assessment of porosity, surface strength and sample-test results.

Can cartons be moved with vacuum suction cups?

Vacuum handling can be evaluated. Check box surface strength, porosity and usable suction area, and arrange cups according to the load distribution to prevent localized suction from deforming the box.

Which workpieces are not suitable for vacuum gripping?

Porous, highly permeable, severely deformed, rough, oily or dusty workpieces may not form a stable vacuum seal. Consider mechanical jaws, internal-expansion tooling or a dedicated gripper.

What if a heavy workpiece has too little usable suction area?

A multi-cup array can distribute load and increase effective area. If the available holding force remains insufficient, assess mechanical jaws, hooks or another suitable gripping method.

Related resources

Open resource center
Selection and Solutions

AUREK-RC-SL-001Downloadable

Pneumatic Industrial Manipulator Selection Guide

Selection methods for total load, working envelope, lifting stroke, tooling and installation, with application information and design-comparison points organized around representative workpieces.

Selection and SolutionsVersion V1.0Updated 2026-09-07

Need documents or a proposal for your site?

For documents, drawings or a selection proposal specific to your workpiece and site conditions, share the workpiece and workstation details and an engineer will contact you directly.

AUREK WeChat QR code
WeChatScan to add an engineer and send drawings, photographs or site video, or email sales@aurek.cn.